Subject	I totally agree, esp. in light of the torque numbers.
Posted by	J-Z91(OH) on October 05, 2003 at 5:06 PM
	This message has been viewed 31 times.
In Reply To	car would be heat soaked by the 3rd chip posted by TARGETZ on October 05, 2003 at 03:27 PM
Message	Stock IC's too. What were the A/F curves ? 91 300ZX 528 whp/553 wtq, 95 Supra 403 whp/402 wtq
Follow Ups	ECU Dyno Comparison at Boost Solutions - kryptonite729 13:25:53 10/05/03 Yeah, for a stage 3 car, these were some great numbers!!! - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:34:42 10/05/03 Can I see the dyno chart? - Stealth021 13:35:19 10/05/03 The guys at Balanced will email us the dyno charts on >>> - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:46:35 10/05/03 Excellent, Now Im curious if your chip can... - Stealth021 15:27:21 10/05/03 ECU can't really reduce lag - ZLover4Life 17:06:42 10/05/03 actually they can.. - zads 19:30:33 10/05/03 Something tells me that is someone else was to do the - ibpimpn 13:39:49 10/05/03 Well, we did the runs immediately one after the other. - George(boost-solutions.com) 13:48:35 10/05/03 one pass or three passes each? (n/m) - ni[X]it 13:51:03 10/05/03 1 pass on each ECU (n/m) - kryptonite729 14:37:42 10/05/03 Bummer. Pointless thread then. (n/m) - ni[X]it 15:12:01 10/05/03 2nd.......... (n/m) - Kyle(Houston) 17:53:04 10/05/03 3rd...They should have taken a much more controlled and - therinL 20:31:51 10/05/03 Very few scientists on this board, - Chip(GMS Racing) 19:41:23 10/05/03 2nd (n/m) - aliaZ 22:40:40 10/05/03 Hi. ALl I am saying, - nixit 09:55:48 10/06/03 I am with you. (n/m) - Chip(GMS Racing) 11:45:12 10/06/03 Agreed, its just a start - kryptonite729 14:28:10 10/06/03 No movie necessary. I just think there was an advantage - ibpimpn 13:57:06 10/05/03 The car came in hot off the streets so it was hot, but... - Stealth021 15:31:00 10/05/03 Doesn't the ECU have to "learn" some parameters for the car? - olyar15 14:04:57 10/05/03 No, Ash learned it most of them. :) (n/m) - BooZted 16:01:46 10/05/03 engrish (n/m) - fourZero 16:08:40 10/05/03 hmmm....interesting (n/m) - NR98 (next year) 13:59:38 10/05/03 Looking forward to the new chip... (n/m) - SooperZ95 14:12:28 10/05/03 Good to see that yall are actually dyno testing everything - JonnyZ (DC) 14:49:10 10/05/03 Re: ECU Dyno Comparison at Boost Solutions - MyWhiteZTT(NJ) 14:53:04 10/05/03 Interesting results... - AshsZ 15:02:34 10/05/03 who pioneered the boost solutions ecu? (n/m) - cant_z_me(retired) 15:05:10 10/05/03 car would be heat soaked by the 3rd chip - TARGETZ 15:27:58 10/05/03 I totally agree, esp. in light of the torque numbers. - J-Z91(OH) 17:06:11 10/05/03 big 3rd!!!! (n/m) - dilly yo 11:04:02 10/06/03 I'm no expert by any stretch but they all seem relitively... - creamofthecrop7 16:04:22 10/05/03 devin makes your eproms right? (n/m) - Timmy! 16:14:43 10/05/03 Intersting. but in the future - Russell@Z1 19:08:36 10/05/03 Future dynos can include that but.. - kryptonite729 21:49:56 10/05/03 We appeciate you ripping us off for that chip. - Russell@Z1 09:39:48 10/06/03 Well, these were the intial runs. Next week we are tuning - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:25:47 10/06/03 Blah! One sided stories suck - kryptonite729 13:24:01 10/06/03 I find this odd...Important information about the topic: - therinL 20:50:22 10/05/03 The car was a stage 5 car, and the AFR was a very rich - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:16:53 10/06/03 A little more on the dyno since some are skeptical - kryptonite729 21:43:04 10/05/03 You should have quit while you were ahead :/ (n/m) - ibpimpn 22:24:20 10/05/03 I think you should have conducted a more controlled test. - Marshall 23:07:30 10/05/03 OK, now this is great. You told us that your eprom had gone - John@Z1 09:41:01 10/06/03 Let me fully explain this then - kryptonite729 11:01:26 10/06/03 John, wanted to see what all REGULAR chips will do. Stay - George(boost-solutions.com) 11:23:10 10/06/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.